![]() ![]() For example, in an automobile accident case, you could introduce proof of someone’s liability insurance to show that they owned the vehicle. ![]() Some evidence might be prejudicial but nevertheless have a legitimate reason for being introduced. You are introducing the evidence for an alternative purpose.However, the court typically can’t exclude it unless the prejudice “substantially” outweighs the probative value. The prejudice doesn’t outweigh the probative value.For example, in a fraud trial, the defendant might want to prevent the plaintiff from using the word “lying.” You could argue that this word is no more prejudicial than any other word used to describe a deliberate misrepresentation. However, you generally can raise the following counterarguments: Your counterarguments will depend on the circumstances of the case. If you want to oppose the motion in limine, then you need legitimate reasons for doing so. ![]() Civil Procedure ( as well as the rules of most state courts ). X Research sourceīrainstorm counterarguments. Other Matters There are few legal boundaries for motions in limine. For example, you can’t introduce evidence that a defendant has liability insurance to prove that the person was negligent. Each state (and the federal government) has rules of evidence that prevent some kinds of evidence from being introduced.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |